UK: Man who stabbed his neighbour to death in horrific case of mistaken identity where he wrongly believed he was a sex offender is detained indefinitely in hospital

[dailymail.co.uk – 4/16/21]

A man who stabbed his neighbour to death in an horrific case of mistaken identity has been detained indefinitely in hospital.

Richard Matthews killed Paul Wells after wrongly believing he was a sex offender who raped him as a child, Bristol Crown Court heard today.

The court was told how Matthews was convinced he was the victim of a child abuse ring aged 10 and accused Wells of historical abuse when he moved in next door to him in Highbridge, Somerset.

Today, the defendant, 45, was sentenced after admitting one count of manslaughter by diminished responsibility following the attack on June 25 last year.

The family of Mr Wells, 39, described him as an ‘amazing’ man who is sorely missed in a statement read out in court.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

And would the public be outraged if he had killed an actual registrant?

Entirely rhetorical question.

And this is why Tony Blair said “Ok we’ll have a sex offender registry, but it won’t be available to the public online.” He was still wrong to do it because he didn’t assume that people would just dole out the information once the people got a hold of it from the police.

🤔 Killer is 45. Thought his 39 year old neighbor abused him when he was 10. So he was abused by a 4 years old? Ummm, okay. Interesting.🤔

How the hell did he get charged with manslaughter for deliberately killing someone and if he’s 45 and the other dude is 39 how in the hell did he think this dude raped him when he was 10
This just goes to show you gotta be careful It’s alot of crazy people out there with access to your personal information so you gotta be careful you never know what crazy az person might show up at your house and try and kill you

I don’t know and won’t speculate why this guy killed his neighbor. But claiming childhood sexual abuse seems to be becoming the norm when facing murder charges, whether the deceased is a registrant or not.

Odds are if the deceased were actually a registrant, his killer would be claiming to have seen him watching the neighborhood kids (or something equally obscure) and had to do something, but didn’t intend to actually kill him. We’ve all seen that play out numerous times.

Regulatory, indeed….

Oops he made a mistake for taking matters into his own hands and not minding his business. Another murder from the Hit List protecting society and the planet; which killed an innocent person. God bless fear mongering and hate coming to a country near you. Paid by the do gooders of society and endorsed by the absent minded lawmakers!! Viewer discretion is advised.

My name and address and picture and “Sex Offender” is all over the internet for cp conviction. How much you wanna bet that I get stabbed to death.

King George has a database. He looks good regardless.